Appeal of Seacoast Anti-Pollution League
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Dissent
King, C.J., and Batchelder, J.,
dissenting in Part II: The Seacoast Anti-Pollution League as part of its appeal raised the question whether securities issued pursuant to an unsuspended New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUC) order remain valid in the hands of purchasers notwithstanding subsequent appeals or the results of those appeals. The majority has concluded, as urged by Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH), that our statutes require a sweeping declaration of the rights of future litigants, utilities and investors. PSNH cites as its only authority for this unusual…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gazzola v. ClementsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Public Utilities Commission v. Cole's ExpressSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- Appeal of EastonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. BardwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Black v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.