Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Sweeney

Massachusetts Land Court

Decided October 7, 2021No. REG 15-43498, MISC 19-000123Published

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY vs. SWEENEY, REG 15-43498, MISC 19-000123

KENNETH W. SWEENEY, Plaintiff; MARIALAINA A. LANNIN, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH W. SWEENEY, Defendant

REG 15-43498, MISC 19-000123

OCTOBER 7, 2021

PLYMOUTH, ss.

J.FOSTER

DECISION

Introduction

Kenneth Sweeney and Marialaina Lannin own abutting lots that bound on Little Sandy Bottom Pond, a great pond in Pembroke. Their lots were originally laid out as part of a 100+ lot subdivision shown on a July 1915 plan. This plan, like so many plans of the era, created small cottage lots along the water, presumably for vacation use. See, e.g., Zarba v. Town of Oak…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kendall v. SelvaggioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. Labounty v. VickersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Ottavia v. SavareseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Bills v. NunnoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API