Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Forgings Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1981No. Appeals, Nos. 2234 C.D. 1979 and 564 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

The two cases which have been consolidated for appeal here involve awards of benefits by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) pursuant to The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act)1 for facial and neck disfigurement resulting from burns sustained by claimants while working for Pittsburgh Forgings Company (employer). We affirm.

At the times of their respective injuries, claimant, Perry 0. Rose, and claimant, Dennis K. Stark, both worked as hot press operators or “trimmers” in employer’s forge shop. As trimmers, claimants work on the opposite side…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. East Coast Shows v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Ellwood Quality Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API