Zenko v. Boucher
Michigan Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceN. J. Kaufman, J.
I concur with my brother O’Hara that abandonment of this contract to purchase is not sustained by the evidence. However, I do not agree that it follows, a fortiori, that defendant is entitled to specific performance of the contract on his counterclaim. One further question remains: Was plaintiff-seller justified in terminating the contract of sale because defendant failed to complete the purchase within the 60 days specified in the contract or within a reasonable time? The specific dates of the transactions between the parties are relevant to this inquiry.
The parties entered into the contract…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Duke v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Nedelman v. MeiningerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Kennedy v. BradyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Williams v. MetoyerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dept of Agriculture and Rural Development v. Kenneth L EngleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022