Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Zenko v. Boucher

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1975No. Docket No. 20303PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceN. J. Kaufman, J.

I concur with my brother O’Hara that abandonment of this contract to purchase is not sustained by the evidence. However, I do not agree that it follows, a fortiori, that defendant is entitled to specific performance of the contract on his counterclaim. One further question remains: Was plaintiff-seller justified in terminating the contract of sale because defendant failed to complete the purchase within the 60 days specified in the contract or within a reasonable time? The specific dates of the transactions between the parties are relevant to this inquiry.

The parties entered into the contract…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Duke v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Nedelman v. MeiningerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Kennedy v. BradyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Williams v. MetoyerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dept of Agriculture and Rural Development v. Kenneth L EngleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API