Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gail Merchant Irving v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 18, 1998No. 96-2368Published

1Dissent

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge,

with whom LIPEZ, Circuit Judge, joins (dissenting).

The majority opinion fundamentally misconstrues controlling Supreme Court prece*170dent in analyzing the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). The majority is concerned that permitting Irving’s claim to succeed would undermine OSHA’s broad discretion in deciding how to implement its enforcement policy. No one disputes that the agency as a whole retains considerable discretion. The problem is that the majority undertakes its analysis from the wrong vantage point.

As the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API