Legal Opinion

McCarron v. Bolduc

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff, in the early morning of a Sunday in June, while riding with the defendant as his guest with two others in his automobile.

There was evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff tending to show that while at Nantasket Beach whither they had ridden the defendant drank alcohol: that he started to return by a route different from the one by which he had gone; that it had been raining in the afternoon, and it then was misty and the roads were slippery; that on the way…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Blood v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Learned v. HawthorneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Rog v. EltisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cook v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Dzura v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Desroches v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Caldbeck v. FlintMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Curtis v. ComerfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API