Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hoesen v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 4, 1980Published

1Dissent

Mikoll, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm. Plaintiffs brought the instant motion to effectuate the settlement made between the parties in open court, not to enforce rights accrued under subdivision 1 of section 29 of the Workers’ Compensation Law. An agreement and settlement reached in open court, with co-operation and assistance of counsel and the court itself, should not be disturbed in the absence of the most extraordinary and compelling reasons (Covert v Covert, 50 AD2d 622; Thompson Med. Co. v Benjamin Pharms., 4 AD2d 504). Special Term, therefore, properly looked to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Covert v. CovertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Thompson Medical Co. v. Benjamin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API