Maurino v. Maurino

In an action for a separation, in which a judgment of separation had been granted to the plaintiff wife on January 23,1950, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 6, 1962, which, inter alla, appointed .the wife as receiver of a business owned by the defendant. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Plaintiff’s motion for sequestration and the appointment of a receiver was granted on consent of the defendant, and no appeal lies from the order entered thereon (Kennedy v. Mahoney, 281 App. Div. 831). If defendant is aggrieved by the appointment…