Legal Opinion

Riggs v. City of Florence

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action brought by Riggs against The City of Florence and another, to recover damages sustained by certain live stock belonging to plaintiff, by reason of an unsafe and defective public bridge within the limits of that city. Trial and judgmenfc for the defendant, at the April Term, 1879, of the district court of Marion county. The plaintiff brings the case here. The facts appear in Comm’rs of Marion Co. v. Riggs, 24 Kas. 255, et seq. " .

1Per curiam

The judgment in this case must be affirmed, on the authority of Jansen v. The City of Atchison, 16 Kas. 384, because it nowhere appears that the city had any notice of the defect, or knowledge of facts sufficient to put it upon inquiry, long enough before the time of the injury to repair the bridge.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of La Harpe v. GreerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. City of Pleasanton v. RhineCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898