Legal Opinion

J.K. ex rel. R.K. v. Dillenberg

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 7, 1993No. CIV 91-261 TUC JMRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROLL, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The instant action challenges the sufficiency of behavioral health services provided eli*696gible children pursuant to the state of Arizona’s Medicaid plan. The Second Amended Complaint alleges that state administration of that program violates controlling federal statutes and their implementing regulations. In particular, Plaintiffs contend that the state has imposed or knowingly sanctioned unlawful restrictions on the scope, duration, and amount of medically necessary mental health services, and similarly violated federal regulations governing their…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wiggs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Arizona Ass'n of Providers for Persons with Disabilities v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDERS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Anglin v. KennardDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  5. JK by and Through RK v. DillenbergDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API