Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Green

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Cowley District Court. Action brought by Tucker against Green, to recover damages for an assault and battery. At the November Term, 1881, the court made an order discharging an attachment as to a part of certain property attached therein, which order the plaintiff brings here for review. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This was an action' brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, for damages for an alleged assault and battery. Five thousand dollars were claimed as damages, and plaintiff obtained an order of attachment against the property of the defendant. This was levied on real estate — the property of the defendant — appraised at the value of $4,200. The defendant moved the court to discharge the attachment as to a part of the property attached, upon various grounds, but mainly because the levy under the attachment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiley v. KeokukSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Malone v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  3. Lord v. GaddisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shugar v. GuillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Hodgen v. RoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API