Legal Opinion

Carr v. Beverly Hills Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 31, 1956No. 14349_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

237 F.2d 323

George R. CARR, Appellant,

v.

BEVERLY HILLS CORPORATION, a corporation, John P. Lordan, Maynard Brandsma, Francis E. Browne, Robert W. Langley, Harry F. Dietrich, and Ross J. Ferrar, Appellees.

No. 14349.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 23, 1956.

Rehearing Denied July 31, 1956.

George E. Danielson, Los Angeles, Cal., Thomas Dodd Healy, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Latham & Watkins, Ira M. Price, II, Charles E. Horning, Jr., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Henry F. Prince, Frederic H. Sturdy, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, FEE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges.

JAMES…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Doctor v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Central R. Co. of NJ v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Smith v. SperlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API