Legal Opinion

In re Rasyn W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent contends that she was denied due process of law and a fair hearing because of Family Court’s “relentless, hostile, and derisive” questions. That contention is not preserved for our review, and, in any event, lacks merit. Although it appears that the court, respondent, and respondent’s attorney engaged in some tense verbal exchanges, the record establishes that the court’s questions were designed to clarify respondent’s testimony and the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Stanziano v Stanziano, 235 AD2d 845, 846). The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stanziano v. StanzianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re Jamar W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CURRY, TORRENCE P. v. REESE, LATOYA D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Matter of Kaylee D. (Kimberly D.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. In re Derrick T. M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API