Legal Opinion
Moore v. Indehar
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 1, 2008No. 06-4047PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
Adam Moore appeals from the district court’s decision to grant Officer Kurt Inde-har’s motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. We reverse the grant of summary judgment and remand the matter to the district court for further consideration.
I
Moore argues on appeal that the district court failed to construe the facts of the case in the light most favorable to him, the non-moving party. When bringing a summary judgment motion, the moving party is required to present “the pleadings, the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits [which]…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Mark Atkinson v. City of Mountain ViewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Howard v. Kansas City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Sitzes v. City of West Memphis ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Shawna Hess v. Carol AbelsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Brunsting v. Lutsen Mountains Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.