Krause v. Lloyd
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Floyd District Court. — Hon. P. W. Burr, Judge. Appeal by tbe plaintiff from a judgment rendered• against her for costs “because of want of petition.”—
1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.
1 *6692 8 *667I. This action is to recover treble damages, under section 212, of the Code, which is as follows: “An attorney and counselor who is guilty of deceit or collusion, or consents thereto, with intent to deceive a court, or judge, or a party to an action or proceeding, is liable to be disbarred, and shall forfeit to the injured party treble damages, to be recovered in a civil action.” On May 8, 1894, the plaintiff filed her petition stating that the defendant is a duly-admitted and practicing attorney at law; that in July, 1893, L. L. Krause, her assignee, instituted two suits in justice’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scholl v. Brad Street Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Brown v. McMahonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- City of Muscatine v. Keokuk Northern Line Packet Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frum v. KeeneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Frick v. KabakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Adams v. HoldenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Marshall Ice Co. v. LaPlantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Wisner v. NicholsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.