Legal Opinion · Dissent

William Deveneau v. Susan Weilt and Brian Toomey

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 4, 2016No. 2014-330Published

1Dissent

Robinson, J.,

¶ 19. dissenting. Although a landlord generally has no duty to third parties injured by a tenant’s animals that escape through inadequate fencing erected and maintained solely by the tenant, a landowner in possession of property does have a duty to third parties to act with reasonable care in exercising the control the landowner has over the property. Applying these principles to the facts in this case, plaintiffs evidence is more than sufficient to survive summary judgment, especially in light of the evidence that Toomey never leased the property on which the horses were…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Langle v. KurkulSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. In Re PreseaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API