PCS4LESS, LLC v. Stockton
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This case arises from plaintiffsappellees’ claims that defendants-appellants misappropriated certain exclusive software from appellees. Appellants appeal by leave granted. We affirm in part and reverse in part, albeit for different reasons than those relied on by the trial court.1
As part of their business operations, appellees purchase Motorola cellular phones on the secondary market and then apply certain software that “unlocks” the phones for sale to vendors in the United States and other countries.2 Appellees allege that they purchased the exclusive license for the two applicable software…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harbans Kaur v. Citizens Insurance Company of the MidwestMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Renee Swain v. Michael MorseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Robert Davis v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020