Legal Opinion

Clark v. Clark

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided February 15, 1868PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to change the referee in this case.

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

A motion is made, on behalf of the plaintiff to procure a change of the referee heretofore appointed by the court herein. The action was brought to procure a divorce on the ground of adultery. The change is asked for on the ground that the present referee was referee in a prior action between the same parties, and decided in favor of the defendant. This of itself is not sufficient to call for granting the present motion. It must appear from the testimony taken and proceedings had in the former case, either that the referee had a bias in favor of,4 or prejudice against one of the parties, or…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hyde v. BennettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API