Legal Opinion

Shannon v. McMullin

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 15, 1874PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The case is sufficiently stated by Judge Moncure in his opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

MONCURE, P.

It is well settled that a surety is entitled to be relieved from his liability to pay the debt of his principal, either in toto or pro tanto as the case may be, if the creditor, without the consent of the surety, make a new contract with the principal, founded on valuable consideration, to postpone the day for the payment of the debt for a certain period (however short) beyond the day on which it was to be paid by the terms of the contract on which the surety was liable; or i f the creditor, without the consent of the surety, release any lien which he may have on any property of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  2. Alexander v. ByrdSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  3. Knight v. CharterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. McKenzie v. WileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Saunders v. PruntySupreme Court of Virginia · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API