Legal Opinion

In re Weinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

From an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee in a summary proceeding and directing the appellant, an attorney, forthwith to turn over to the petitioners a certain sum of money and providing that, in default thereof, the said appellant may be punished as for a contempt of court, the latter appeals.

The facts are as follows: The appellant acted in the capacity of attorney at law to represent the interest of the petitioners as lenders of money on mortgage. The Vignali Realty Corporation employed a broker named Mintz, who brought the loan to another broker named Nathaniel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kissam v. SquiresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Purfield v. KathraneCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  2. Entelisano Agency, Inc. v. FeltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API