Legal Opinion
Flack v. Flack
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1988No. D005293PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
On June 29, 1982, an interlocutory judgment dissolved Gerald and Keiko Flack’s marriage of nearly 14 years. Pursuant to a property settlement agreement Gerald’s military pension was declared to be his separate property. On December 31, 1985, Keiko filed a motion to modify the dissolution judgment so as to equitably divide the military pension. On April 14, 1986, the trial court granted the motion. Gerald appeals.
On June 26 1981, the United States Supreme Court held, in McCarty v. McCarty (1981) 453 U.S. 210 [69 L.Ed.2d 589, 101 S.Ct. 2728], military retirement benefits are the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People ex rel. Field v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
- County of Los Angeles v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. Spring Valley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Tunis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Herman v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Herman v. LA COUNTY METRO. TRANSP. AUTH.California Court of Appeal · 1999