Legal Opinion
Hall v. Department of Commerce
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 30, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2016-1619Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __ ) STEVEN H. HALL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et. al.,) Civil Action No. 16-1619 (EGS) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINON AND ORDER Plaintiff Steven Hall (“Mr. Hall”), proceeding pro se, brings suit against the United States Patent and Trade Office (“USPTO”) and USPTO Employee Relations Specialist William House (collectively, “defendants”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 701, et.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Steele v. SchaferCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Ward v. D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.