Legal Opinion

Potter v. City of Pauls Valley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 23, 1968No. 41620PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This action was commenced by plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as “plaintiffs”, against the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as “defendant”, or “City”, to recover possession, or the value, of certain pipe, valves, and other personal property of a similar nature, constituting the water distribution system of the Hill-crest Addition to the defendant city.

At the trial, the court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the evidence on the ground that the action was barred by limitations. After the overrulirig of their motion for a new trial, plaintiffs perfected…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Selected Investments Corp. v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Methodist Episcopal Church South v. Mayor of VicksrurgMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
  3. City of Wewoka Ex Rel. Culp v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. BurrowsUtah Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API