Legal Opinion
Janet D. Krizek v. Cigna Group Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 24, 2003No. Docket 02-9321PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KATZMANN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Janet Krizek suffers from a mysterious ailment, which has perplexed numerous doctors for several years. Despite undergoing a multitude of tests and medical evaluations, Krizek has been unable to find a definitive diagnosis for her condition. Krizek’s symptoms have worsened through the years, causing severe pain, fatigue, and other problems and eventually forcing her to cease working. She brings the instant litigation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., against defendant-appellee Insurance Company…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Kathleen M. Cifra v. General Electric Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation, as Its SuccessorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- John Doe v. Frederick Menefee, Warden, Warden of the Otisville Federal Correctional Institution the Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Dennis Paese v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Marianne Locher v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, Katten Muchin & ZavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Asuncion Mota v. Rivera CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Denney v. BDO Seidman, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.