Legal Opinion

Malcolm R. Wommack v. Durham Pecan Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 26, 1983No. 82-1334PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

This patent infringement action has been brought by the inventor of a patented process against his former employer requesting reasonable royalties for the employer’s use of the process in his plant. The employer admits that he used the process and he neither contests the validity of plaintiff’s patent nor asserts any right to receive assignment of the patent arising from the contract of employment. Instead, the employer claims he had acquired a shop right or implied license to use the process and he therefore owes plaintiff nothing. We agree with the employer’s position and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Grant v. RaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  2. In Re Intercat, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2000
  3. Max C. McElmurry and White River Technologies, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light Company, Entergy Corporation and Middle South UtilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Belliveau v. BarcoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  5. McClain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API