Legal Opinion

In re Dooley

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 20, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BONDY, District Judge.

This is a motion made for the return of records and merchandise illegally seized during the search of petitioner’s premises in a most outrageous manner without a warrant, and for the suppression of the evidence obtained as a result thereof, not only as against petitioner whose premises were unlawfully searched and whose property was illegally seized, but also as against other persons charged, -together with the petitioner, with having violated the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA), notwithstanding that the charges against petitioner have been dismissed.

The illegality of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  5. United States v. SpallinoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schenck Ex Rel. Chow Fook Hong v. WardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API