Moriarty v. Home Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant, Home Insurance Company of New York, from an order of the District Court of Eamsey County, Hascal R. Brill, J., made February 15, 1893, denying its motion for a new trial after verdict for plaintiff, James Moriarty, for $521.85.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Plaintiff was insured by defendant’s policy upon a certain dwelling house. The policy contained, among other conditions : “If the above-mentioned premises shall be occupied or used so as to increase the risk, or become vacant or unoccupied, without notice to and consent of this company in writing, or the risk be increased by the erection or occupation of neighboring buildings, or by any means whatever within the control of the assured, without the consent of this company indorsed hereon, * * * then, and in every such case, this policy shall be void.”
*550The dwelling having, become vacant, by a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O'Riley v. ClampetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- O'Riley v. ClampetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893