Gittings v. . Russel
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 12,1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term vacating a judgment heretofore entered in the above-entitled action by default on the ground of lack of jurisdiction."
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 12,1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term vacating a judgment heretofore entered in the above-entitled action by default on the ground of lack of jurisdiction." The following question was certified : “Were the warrant of attachment and the notice served by the sheriff sufficient to give to the Trust Company of America notice that the defendant herein had an individual interest in the estate of Kate B. Russel, William H. Russel, Administrator, and was an…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. Question certified answered in the negative.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Cotnareanu v. Chase National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Graphic Offset Corp. v. Franklin National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1958