Legal Opinion
Barth v. Green
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1890No. 3268PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from Navarro. Tried below before Hon. Rnfus Hardy.
1Opinion of the Court
HEHBY, Associate Justice.
—This was an action of trespass to try title, brought by the appellant against the appellee, to recover lots 8, 9, and 10, in block No. 29, of the Houston & Texas Central Railroad addition to the city of Corsicana. The defendant pleaded not guilty.
It was agreed that the Houston & Texas Central Railroad Company was the common source of title.
Plaintiff introduced the following evidence:
A deed from the railroad company to James Garrity for the land in controversy, dated in the year 1879.
( A deed from James Garrity to W. H. Barth, the plaintiff, dated the 6th day of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Crosby v. ArdoinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Porter v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Odom v. Empire Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Garcia v. ClearyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Millerman v. MegarittyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.