Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 7, 1995No. 94-00421PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Tyrone Franklin questions the denial of his motion to suppress cocaine and raises some sentencing issues. We affirm the conviction and sentence, but strike certain probation conditions imposed without oral pronouncement at the sentencing.

We find no merit to the appellant’s issues concerning denial of the motion to suppress and the costs of probation supervision. See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181, 105 S.Ct. 940, 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985); State v. Gavin, 594 So.2d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); State v. Viamari, 462 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 2d…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blanco v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Nank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Tomlinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Hart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Curry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Augustin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API