State v. Vierria
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
46 Submitted January 14; portion of judgments requiring defendant to pay probation-violation assessments vacated, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed October 7, 2020 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FREDERICK LEE VIERRIA, aka Frederick Lee Vierra, Defendant-Appellant. Klamath County Circuit Court 18CR17038, 18CR17038; A168819 (Control), A168929
476 P3d 506
Defendant appeals probation-violation judgments, challenging the trial court’s imposition of a $25 probation-violation assessment in each instance. He contends that the court erred because it did not announce its intention…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BaccaroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. HillmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. PachoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. PostlethwaitCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. PickerelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. PedenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020