Legal Opinion

State v. Vierria

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 7, 2020No. A168819PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

46 Submitted January 14; portion of judgments requiring defendant to pay probation-violation assessments vacated, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed October 7, 2020 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FREDERICK LEE VIERRIA, aka Frederick Lee Vierra, Defendant-Appellant. Klamath County Circuit Court 18CR17038, 18CR17038; A168819 (Control), A168929

476 P3d 506

Defendant appeals probation-violation judgments, challenging the trial court’s imposition of a $25 probation-violation assessment in each instance. He contends that the court erred because it did not announce its intention…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BaccaroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. HillmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. PachoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. PostlethwaitCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. PickerelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. PedenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API