State ex rel. Moberly Special Road District v. Burton
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Randolph. Circuit Court. — Hon. A. H. Waller, Judge. (1) The law passed by the General Assembly, authorizing and directing the payment of special road and bridge funds to the incorporated special road district is valid, and within the legal rights of the Legislature to enact such law.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Randolph. Circuit Court. — Hon. A. H. Waller, Judge. (1) The law passed by the General Assembly, authorizing and directing the payment of special road and bridge funds to the incorporated special road district is valid, and within the legal rights of the Legislature to enact such law. Sec. 10482, R. S. 1909, as amended by Laws 1913, pp. 669, 670; Harris v. Bond Co., 244 Mo. 664; State ex rel. v. Sheppard, 192 Mo. 506; State -ex rel. v. Warner, 197 Mo. 656; Ex parte Roberts, 166 Mo. 212; Cass County v. Jack, 49 >Mo. 196; Dillon on Municipal Corporations (5 Ed.), sec. 92, p. 142,…
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The city of Moberly and contiguous territory in Randolph County for a distance of *716four, miles in each direction from said city, was, under the authority of sections 10576-10586, Revised Statutes 190-9, as amended by Laws 1911, p. 370, organized as a body corporate, to be thereafter designated as the “Moberly Special Road District.” This action by mandamus was brought in the circuit court of said county by the State at the relation of said road district as plaintiff against thé judges of the county court of Randolph County as defendants, to compel the latter to pay over (under the provisions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Applegate v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Glasgow v. RowseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- State ex rel. Dickason v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- McGrew v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Vrooman v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- City of Kansas City v. FishmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- St. Louis County v. University CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Harry L. Hussman Refrigerator & Supply Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- State v. TalloSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.