Legal Opinion
Reynaldo Hurtado Flores v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 15, 1998No. 96-71106Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
134 F.3d 377
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Reynaldo Hurtado FLORES, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 96-71106.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 12, 1998.**
Decided Jan. 15, 1998.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Before: BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Antonio Hernandez-Robledo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Rosa Torres-Guzman and Alberto Torres-Guzman v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Salim Mawji v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982