Legal Opinion

Automotive Products Corp. v. Wolverine Bumper & Specialty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1926No. 4400PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Pageol, a citizen of California, as patentee, gave an exclusive license .to the Automotive Company, a California corporation. It did not contain any express power of revocation. After a period of inaction by the licensee, Pageol insisted that he was no longer bound. Later he transferred rights under the same patent to the American Chain Company, a corporation of New York. Later he and this company began a suit in a California state court of general equity jurisdiction, making the Automotive Company defendant, and seeking both a decree that the first license be rescinded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Grable v. KillitsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. Dennison Brick & Tile Co. v. Chicago Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  5. Vogue Co. v. Vogue Hat Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Leach v. Ross Heater & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Whittel v. RocheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. Second Nat. Bank of Houston v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  4. Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  5. Bendix Aviation Corporation v. KuryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API