Legal Opinion
Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Chabad Lubavitch of Greater Ft. Lauderdale, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 8, 2011No. 4D10-762PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDamoorgian, J.
Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and granting of Chabad Lubavitch’s motion for summary judgment.1 We reverse.
The following is a recitation of the undisputed material facts. A building owned by Chabad was damaged when a crane landed on it during Tropical Storm Barry. At the time, Chabad had two policies on the damaged building. The first, which is the subject of this appeal, was an “all risk” policy issued by Lloyd’s. It contained the following “Windstorm or Hail Exclusion” (“windstorm exclusion”) provision:
W…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Gulf Power Co. v. HarperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Watkins v. American Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bartram, LLC v. Landmark American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2012
- Misha Enterprises v. GAR Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- 7001 East 71st Street LLC v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Jmp Investment Group, Inc. v. Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011