Legal Opinion

McKillip v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1916No. 22,904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Howard Circuit Court; William C. Purdum, Judge. Prosecution by tbe State of Indiana against John F. McKillip. From a judgment of conviction, tbe defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtErwin, J.

This was a prosecution for trespass. The facts disclosed by the record are, that in the year 1891 certain lands were conveyed by one James MeKillip and wife, by warranty deed, to the trustees of the Church of Christ at Walnut Grove, in Howard County. It was insisted by appellant that by reason of certain provisions in the deed that the land had reverted to. the heirs of the original owners of the lands. The church building erected on said lands ceased to be used for church purposes for more than a year, whereupon appellant, who was a son of the original grantors, moved some personal effects…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Indiana Board of Pharmacy v. HaagIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Windsor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Howe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Indiana Board of Pharmacy v. HaagIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Barber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API