Legal Opinion
Pinkus v. H. Zussman & Son Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenneb, J.
Motion by plaintiff to confirm the report of an Official Referee.
Defendants had moved to set aside the service of the summons on the ground that it was never delivered and that the defendants are foreign corporations not subject to the jurisdiction of the court. The motion was referred to an Official Referee who filed a report which, in effect, upholds the service.
Defendants contended that they were not doing business in this State; that the person served in the action was not the managing agent or other person permitted to be served under section 229 of the Civil Practice Act in place of an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coler v. Pittsburgh Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Ray D. Lillibridge, Inc. v. Johnson Bronze CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hamlin v. G. E. Barrett & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- McKeon v. P. J. McGowan & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Pennrich & Co. v. Juniata Hosiery Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cohen v. Vaughan Bassett Furniture Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980