Legal Opinion

United States v. David W. Warren

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1984No. 82-1161PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.

Defendant David W. Warren, a practicing osteopathic physician in Kansas City, Missouri, was convicted after a jury trial of three counts of mail fraud in violation of 18

U.S.C. §§ 1341 & 2. 1 Defendant appeals his conviction on the grounds that (1) the outrageous conduct of the Government investigators violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the guilty verdict; (3) the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on the elements of the offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1341; and (4) the trial court abused its…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Rafael Santana and Francis FuentesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Bancoklahoma Mortgage Corp. v. Capital Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Bobby Ray MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API