Legal Opinion
Lockner v. Pierce Cnty.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 2018No. 94643-4PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
González, J.
*528¶ 1 This case asks us to clarify the scope of Washington's recreational use immunity statute, RCW 4.24.210.1 Margie Lockner was injured when she fell from her bicycle on a trail maintained by Pierce County (County).
*529Lockner sued the County for negligence. Finding that recreational use immunity precluded her suit because the unintentional injury happened on land open to the public for recreational use without a fee, the trial court dismissed Lockner's claim on summary judgment. The Court of Appeals reversed, mistakenly relying on the dissent in this court's opinion in Camicia v.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Port Of Tacoma, V. Joel Sacks, Dept. Of L & ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State v. Econ. Dev. Bd. for Tacoma-Pierce Cnty.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Carl W. Schwartz v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Friends Of Clark County And Futurewise, V Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Okert v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.