Estate of Tittel
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a petition for the sale of real estate of a deceased person. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Out of the separate estate of Bernard Ernst Tittel, deceased, was set apart a homestead to the widow during her widowhood, under section 1465 of the Code of Civil Procedure. During the administration an order of family allowance was made in favor of the widow, in the sum of eighty dollars per month. This family allowance remained unpaid until it aggregated $3,370. It is still' an unpaid charge against the estate. At the same time, the only property out of which this charge can be met is the estate in remainder of the heirs in the land so set apart as a homestead. The widow, therefore,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Estate of HardwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hadsall v. HadsallNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Miers v. MiersMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Estate of Tate, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1887
- Hagar v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931