Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hoey v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 23, 1939No. 431PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion for a stay is denied. The decree is affirmed. Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. Union Pacific R. Co., 222 U. S. 541, 547-548; Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U. S. 294, 311-312; United States v. American Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402, 411.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Los Angeles Switching CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Gregg Cartage & Storage Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. State v. KluttzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API