Barker v. Critzer
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Chase District Court. Action by Barlcer against Critzer, to compel tbe specific performance of a certain contract. At tbe April Term, 1885, tbe court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition, and rendered judgment against him for costs. The plaintiff brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by M. E. Barker in the district court of Chase county, against W. E. Critzer, to compel the specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale and conveyance of certain real estate. The de*460fendant demurred to the plaintiff's petition, upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which demurrer was sustained by the court below. The plaintiff brings the case to this court.
It is alleged in the plaintiff's petition in the court below, that on May 2, 1884, and…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Friendly v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Mitchell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Zeigler v. CongerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- McKenzie v. SuttonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- New England Box Co. v. PrentissSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909