Legal Opinion

Rose v. Palmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mandamus. Application for mandamus to require respondent to grant a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

The petition in this case is for mandamus to require the circuit judge to grant a new trial in the case of Luton v. Rose, tried in the Newaygo circuit, wherein a judgment was obtained by default for $1,525.25.

The suit was commenced by attachment, which was levied upon land, and the writ was also personally served upon the defendant.

13381

*333The declaration was upon the common counts, the ad damnum being stated at $1,000. The plaintiff, against the objection of defendant, was allowed to remit the excess above the ad damnum. It was then ascertained that a draft of an affidavit of non-appearance of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carton v. DayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Starke v. HoerningDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API