Meyer v. Pacific Mail Steamship Co.
District Court, N.D. California
In Admiralty. Libel in personam to recover damages for failure to ’carry and deliver freight in accordance with terms of hill of lading. Answer sets np mutual mistake in the terms of the bill of lading. Exceptions to answer.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, District Judge.
The libel alleges that on the 22d day of May, 1891, E. L. G. Steele & Co., of San Francisco, delivered to the Pacific Mail Steamship Company, at the port of San Francisco, state of California, 2,200 gunnies of wheat and 5,000 gunnies of com, in good order and well-conditioned, to he carried and transported upon the si earner San Bias, or any of said company’s steamers, or steamers employed by them, then lying in the port of San Francisco, and bound for Panama, unto the port of Champerico, in the republic of Guatemala, and there, delivered in good order to the libelants,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- The Steamer EclipseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Andrews v. Essex Fire & Marine Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822
- Williams v. Providence Washington Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1893
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fred I. Putnam and James A. Overman v. Harry C. Lower, John Kadlec, George S. Herning, Edgar L. Peecher, William E. Barquist and Norman L. BunkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- United Transportation & Lighterage Co. v. New York & Baltimore Transp. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Armour & Co. v. Fort Morgan Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- The KalfarliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- The Thomas P. Beal.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.