Legal Opinion

Vasconez v. Langston Companies, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided May 24, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02160Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION WILSON R. VASCONEZ, Plaintiff, vs. NO. 2:20-cv-02160-JTF-cgc LANGSON COMPANIES, INC., Defendant. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Disqualify Counsel. (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) #36). Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, the instant motion has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for determination. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff’s motion is hereby DENIED. I. Background On March 5, 2020, Plaintiff Wilson Vasconez…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Manning v. Waring, Cox, James, Sklar & AllenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Alticor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Dana Corp. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Mutual of Northern OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re Petition for Mandamus by Everett MechemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Bartech Industries, Inc. v. International Baking Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API