Legal Opinion

Tiffany v. Rothschild

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 24, 1953No. 35101PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Justice.

Plaintiff brought this action seeking specific performance of a contract to sell certain real estate owned in common by defendants. To her third amended petition, which is complete and a substitute for all previous petitions, defendants filed no moc tion to make more definite and certain but filed their separate demurrers. The court sustained defendants’ separate demurrers; plaintiff refused to plead further and elected to stand on said petition. From the order sustaining the demurrers and dismissing the cause plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff alleged that defendant Leo Rothschild…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beaverton Power Co. v. Wolverine Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Fite v. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Oakes v. TrumboSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Davies v. FullertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gff Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Anderson v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Orcutt v. Tucson Warehouse & Transfer CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Heltzel v. Mecham PontiacCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. GFF Corporation v. Associated WholesaleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API