Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Railroad Commission
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1960No. A-7734PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenhill
Roy Gardner brings this direct appeal from the 126th District Court of Travis County. Because the appeal does not come within our limited jurisdiction on direct appeal, we do not reach the merits of the controversy and must dismiss the appeal.
Gardner brought in a gas well in Matagorda County in December of 1958. The Railroad Commission classified the well as a discovery well in the Bruce-Flo or Frio E-3 sand. With that classification, the well was entitled to produce for 18 months at the rate of 25% of its potential under statewide rules 24 and 25 of the Railroad Commission. Gardner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boston v. GarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Bryson v. High Plains Underground Water Conservation District No. OneTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Corona v. GarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Lipscomb v. FlahertyTexas Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mitchell v. Purolator Security, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. Episcopal ChurchTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Gardner v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Perry v. Del RioTexas Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.