Legal Opinion

Mann v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1931No. 8913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

The defendants were convicted for conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) and various revenue laws of the United States. . The manner in which said conspiracy was to be effected, and the overt acts committed in furtherance thereof, are.stated and set out with sufficient dearness and detail. Conviction resulted. The brief of appellants is a confused and incoherent jumble of argument and citation, constructed in absolute defiance of, or indifference to, the explicit rules of this court. Because of this, the conception of counsel for appellants…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Muench v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Reliable Auto Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Firotto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Andrews Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  5. Shepard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API