Legal Opinion

United States v. John R. Whitlow

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 25, 2002No. 01-3999PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

In what has become a common sequence, a defendant who waived his appellate rights as part of a plea bargain, and received a substantial benefit in exchange, has failed to keep his promise. After being indicted for 30 financial crimes, John Whitlow pleaded guilty to four counts and the rest were dismissed. The plea agreement provides that “in exchange for the concessions made by the United States” Whitlow waives his rights to appeal and to seek collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The benefits of the agreement were substantial. Whitlow not only obtained the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald BehrmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Dennis L. WengerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Tyrone HareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Henry Don JeffriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. United States v. Marvis H. BownesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Devon RocheCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. SakellarionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. SuraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Stephen R. SinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API