Legal Opinion
General Machinery Corp. v. Clearing Mach. Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 28, 1938No. 6330PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TREANOR, Circuit Judge. ®. Appellant is plaintiff below^ and is the °f thc B,y“Iemt Patcat “ „s!ut’ No. 1,827,5d8, isj>ued October ^ 13, 1931. The plaintiffs bill of complaint charged infrmgemeni of the Byerlein patent and for its charged infringement relies upon claims 7, 9, 18, 19, and 21 of the patent. The defenses were the invalidity of the claims and non-infringement of Claim 21, defendant admitting infringement of Claims 7, 9, 18 and 19.
_ _ 1 he District Court ordered dismissal of the plaintiff’s bill for want of equity.1
Plaintiff urges that the District Court erred in holding, (1) that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- Huntman Stabilizer Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Blanc v. Spartan Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- General Machinery Corp. v. Clearing Mach. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939